Truth be told, though, I own a FZ200 and never really liked the generally noisy Jpegs it produces. My previous camera which is busy dying a slow death is a Lumix DMC-FZ150 and I have LOVED it. Of course, I can live with being wrong on that one. At shorter focal lengths, you have the advantage with the FZ1000. Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ300 Kompakt fotoğraf makineleri uygun fiyatları & modelleri sahibinden.com'da sahibinden mobil uygulamasının milyonlarca kullanıcısına sen de katıl ! I appreciate your time. Personally, I'd go with the FZ1000. Right now I can see a picture of two tango dancers here on the right hand side under FINISHED CHALLENGES. Put simply, some photographers can drag the poorest results from any camera and post ‘em on websites for everyone to see. Bottom line, the advantage of the FZ300 might be "weather sealing" and the ability to add a TC. So my big question is: IS IT WORTH SACRIFICING THE DIFFERENCE IN ZOOM TO GET THE BIGGER SENSOR? Admittedly the newer processor could be completely responsible for the vast difference in quality I see between FZ300 and FZ200 Jpegs, but I suspect at least a slight change was made to the sensor too. I have to agree with everything that you said. APN: Lumix-FZ300 Dépt. Ultimately, whilst wider angle shots taken with a FZ1000 may offer more dynamic range, I’m still completely satisfied with the occasional landscapes I shoot with the FZ330 and print up to A1 poster size. Bottom line, I’d still choose the FZ300 over the 1000 any day. Et kamera som passer for deg som trenger en reisekamerat. With the FZ1000ii the 1000 is just now catching up to the more recent technology. The constant f2.8 and other upgrades the FZ330 has would make a noticeable step up from the FZ150, not least the use of f2.8 at full zoom when much better shutter speeds become available. C'mon. So yes my biggest consideration is the benefit of the FZ1000 1" sensor over the larger zoom of the FZ300. I have Nothing against the FZ300/330, I have the FZ200 and still use it. I am new to this forum and not a pro photographer. But I acknowledge I’m biased toward lighter and smaller bridge cameras and mainly only shoot at the long end and in decent light. I share your opinion about the FZ80. And that's what this comparison (and the other comparison shots in the OP of the linked thread) are good enough to demonstrate: That choosing the 200(300) over the 1000 for a noticeable reach advantage is most likely not rewarding. The original pics with exif are in the OP of the linked thread. But Raw files are identical and the lens is the same. * In addition, a side lever on the left side of the lens barrel improves lens control. Malcolm the Old Sea DogGalleries at http://www.pbase.com/oldseadog/galleries. Eigenschaften und Lieferumfang. You don't need to spend a lot of money to really start enjoying your camera. !Shutter speed used was 1/50sec ... means the photographer cought the dancers in a moment when there was next to no movement. Then send it to yourself, or a friend, with a link to retrieve it at any time. Personally, I normally limited the FZ330 to ISO 800 and would push to 1600. With a 50MP sensor, it gives you tons of resolution, but it also lets you fire off burst images at 30 fps for fast action sports. Firstly K, thank you for your appreciation of my contributions. While the 1" sensor on the FZ1000 can get you useable shots at ISO 2500 and maybe ISO 3200, so you can push for lots lower light. Here's the 200/300 comparisons again (200 on the left): We can end up on a fence here: more comparable images on one side and real-world (what one can expect to get during actual shooting) on the other. (P8) Chiusura del software I’m also often blown away by the results I can get from the model with the smaller sensor. Dels genom det mycket stora zoomomfånget, dels genom den unikt fina ljusstyrkan på f/2,8 genom hela zoomintervallet. Not quite 600mm. 4Avviare LUMIX Tether ( ). If you need a longer cable, combine the cable that came with your camera with a 16' (5m) Tether Pro Active Extension. You can reach us at 1 888-854-65651 888-854-6565 (Monday - Friday 9am to 5pm MST), Stay connected with our monthly newsletter and be the first to know about new product releases, deals and special industry events. (In cam jpeg settings for NR set to lowest for both cams): The only problem I encountered with the 300's jpegs was occasional detail smearing in low contrast shadow areas. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2500 and recommended the best. However, these graphic items become a hindrance when the software is used to capture camera view for live streaming. View full Panasonic Lumix FZ300 specs on CNET. Greatvreach but just didn’t have IQ for me. If I did, I would go for the indulgently expensive Sony RX10 mk4, which is surely the ultimate all-in-one wildlife package of the moment. Panasonic 宣布于 2020 年 6 月 8 日发布“LUMIX Tether for Streaming (Beta) ”。Windows 测试版软件程序源自传统的“LUMIX Tether（1.7 版）”，并为该软件用于直播的情况提供了额外的显示选项。它可以在不断增长的自拍流媒体机遇中为用户提供便利。 ISO 100, ISO 1600, ISO 200, ISO 3200, ISO 400, ISO 6400, ISO 800, ISO auto If like you, I were still using the dreadfully noisy and slower-to-focus FZ200, I’d possibly be considering a FZ1000 too. Kameraet er værtettet så den tåler regn og støv. Therefore this comparison should be valid for FZ300 vers FZ1000 too. Will I be able to zoom in and crop the photos on the FZ1000 and still be satisfied? ou Pays: 13 Date d'inscription : 23/05/2014: Sujet: Re: FZ300 , nos réglages pratiques et pourquoi Dim 21 Aoû 2016 - 12:03: Bonjour à tous, When I was using my FZ300, I would try to lock it in at ISO100 whenever possible and under no circumstances, go above ISO 400. For many, 800mm i.Zoom does exceed the 600mm reach of the smaller FZ, but admittedly not true for ultimate IQ. (Optical Image Stabilizer) effectively suppresses vibration ensures clear, steady shots every time. Plus, the 300 is weather sealed, which is something I’m most appreciative of as I live in a country where the next rain shower is never far away, and it’s nice to be able to carry on shooting in conditions during which I’ve previously had to switch off cameras that aren’t shower proof. But we have a budget and a desire for a Lumix bridge camera. And they've already limited themselves to a noisy pinhead sensor with narrow dynamic range and its penchant for blowing out highlights. •È possibile disabilitare le notifiche di aggiornamento. TBH, for the OP's stated needs, I should actually be recommending an even larger sensored camera. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 is the update to the very popular FZ200. When my FZ200 dies, I'll be replacing it with a minimum 1" sensor model.". Empty cart. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that might be a bit older but still offer a lot of bang for the buck. Pro Tethering Kit $ 349.95 – $ 369.95 Select options; Starter Tethering Kit $ 84.55 – $ 104.55 Select options; What's the best camera for travel? The larger sensor will work to your advantage in most instances. Your Shopping Cart will be saved and you'll be given a link. Yes, like you I have been extremely happy with and love my FZ300 and would probably buy another one if I had problems with this one. MSRP $599.99 $397.99 at Amazon If you don't use the extra zoom a lot, you are probably better off with the FZ1000, even if it has less zoom, and a slightly slower lens at full zoom. Air Direct Wireless Tethering System is ideal for camera control and image transfer using a Mac or Windows computer and your tethering software of choice. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. Zobacz inne Aparaty cyfrowe, najtańsze i najlepsze oferty, opinie. You already have the FZ150 for reach. It is produced by Panasonic and is available […] For this next set of crops I zoomed both cameras in to 100mm equivalent – exactly half way through the Sony RX10 II’s range, but only a sixth of the way through the FZ330 / FZ300’s. ∫Aggiornamento di LUMIX Tether Leggere una notifica di aggiornamento quando si avvia il software. The LUMIX FZ300 features a snug, hand-fitting grip and an intuitive level of operation. Lumix Tether for Streaming 1.0 Beta Englisch: Panasonic-Kameras als Webcams nutzen, das klappt mit der Gratis-Software "Lumix Tether for Streaming". But, if anything were to happen to it, I'd replace it with the FZ1000. Add in 8K video capture and you have a really impressive package. -I don't think so. I often need to take indoor photos too (often at great distance, without flash) - ballet, gymnastics, drama  - this is why higher ISO is important to me too. I prefer the 300's jpegs too, especially when iso leaves base. But I’d suggest that as the FZ300 600mm shot would still contain more information than the centre FZ1000 crop, the FZ300 would make for better prints where the shooting conditions and distance between camera and main subject where the same in good light. You might be even more blown away by the FZ1000, with its improved sensitivity, dynamic range, lower noise, and possibly sharper lens. The biggest differences I can see between the two cameras: Zoom (24x on the FZ300 vs 16x on the FZ1000). But as long as the Raw files match so closely as in my comparison below we don't really need to know. I am not real sure how much I would trust "weather sealing", but overall, I think you will get better results with the FZ1000. I own one of those too, and I’d suggest that if you’re happy with the 150, you’re likely to be even more chuffed after obtaining the FZ300. 1. The rear/side dials control the main aperture and shutter speed settings. When I bought my FZ300 I also looked at the FZ1000. Your Shopping Cart will be saved with Product pictures and information, and Cart Totals. All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2021 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. This camera uses a proprietary camera cable. Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. Send us a message and we'll be in touch with you within 1-2 business days. If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. It shoots 4K video, and it can shoot up to 240 frames per second at lower resolution. Use the cable that came with your camera.If you need a longer cable, combine the cable that came with your camera with a 16' (5m) Tether Pro Active Extension. Yes, that would definitely be the biased choice. I think it's advantage FZ1000 (for me). Many folks insist on using the 200 wide open at full zoom, which to me was never a wise practice. I have the FZ2000 with 485mm and, yes, it can effectively achieve more that the FZ300’s 600mm but, on balance, I prefer a real 600mm. And indoors, in lower light conditions, the larger sensor will more than compensate for the slightly slower lens. Of course, the FZ300/330 has touch screen if that's important. I have also opted for the FZ300 but only because of its much grater reach when used with tele converter (which the FZ1000 isn't built for but the 300 is). I’ve yet to see convincing evidence of this, but I acknowledge the larger sensor of the 1000 is advantageous at 400mm and below and especially when it comes to landscapes, etc. While the Mk 1 FZ1000 is at discounted prices, it may be your best bet. Lumix Tether for Streaming allows users to take full control of the way they look on social media and video conferences by allowing them to switch off that unflattering built-in webcam in favour of a professional Lumix camera. Btw, thanks for the detailed inputs you are giving at times, -allways a pleasure to read! Page 1 Jargon Free Setup & Use Easy to follow set up and use of the Panasonic Lumix Fz300/330 in conjunction with my YouTube video series written by Graham Houghton September 2017 Beginners Guide to the FZ300/330 Page ! Yes, 1” sensor is certainly better than the 1/2.3, much higher ISO ceiling and lots of cropping capability. Some here claim that the 1ich sensor of the 1000 crops to match the quality of the 300 at full zoom. With so many variables in skill of user and capability of machine, that is exactly why I take the views of backyard DIY testers with a pinch of salt. Why is Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 better than Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200? BM Premium High Capacity DMW-BLC12 Battery for Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II DC-G95 DMC-G85 DMC-GH2 DMC-G5 DMC-G6K DMC-G7 DMC-GX8 DMC-FZ200 DMC-FZ300 DMC-FZ1000 DMC-FZ2500 Cameras 5.0 out of 5 stars 3 $16.99 $ 16 . Under 2012 kom Panasonic DMC-FZ200, som i flera avseenden revolutionerade marknaden för superzoomkompakter. But lets say we had such and the 200(ore 300) would come out as the winner when pixel peeping at 100% ...-Do you really think it would be so vastly superior that one would still notice a difference when viewed at a realistically useable magnification of say 60-70%. If, like me, you can put up with the fact that the FZ300 still only goes to 600mm instead of the shockingly bad FZ80’s 1200mm, I cannot recommend the 300 highly enough. (I’m not holding my breath for an upgrade, just hoping that one comes.). Panasonic Lumix FZ330 / FZ300 vs Sony RX10 II quality at 100mm equivalent.